Text in force at CS25-28: from CS25-6, effective 6 Jul 2009.
M25.1 Fuel tank flammability exposure requirements (a) The Fleet Average Flammability Exposure level of each fuel tank, as determined in accordance with Appendix N of CS-25, must not exceed 3 percent of the Flammability Exposure Evaluation Time (FEET), as defined in Appendix N of CS-25. If flammability reduction means (FRM) are used, neither time periods when any FRM is operational but the fuel tank is not inert, nor time periods when any FRM is inoperative may contribute more than 1.8 percent to the 3 percent average fleet flammability exposure of a tank. (b) The Fleet Average Flammability Exposure, as defined in Appendix N of this part, of each fuel tank for ground, takeoff/climb phases of flight during warm days must not exceed 3 percent of FEET in each of these phases. The analysis must consider the following conditions.
(1) The analysis must use the subset of flights starting with a sea level ground ambient temperature of 26.7°C [80° F] (standard day plus 11.7°C (21° F) atmosphere) or more, from the flammability exposure analysis done for overall performance.
(2) For the ground, takeoff/climb phases of flight, the average flammability exposure must be calculated by dividing the time during the specific flight phase the fuel tank is flammable by the total time of the specific flight phase.
(3) Compliance with this paragraph may be shown using only those flights for which the aeroplane is dispatched with the flammability reduction means operational. M25.2 Showing compliance (a) The applicant must provide data from analysis, ground testing, and flight testing, or any combination of these, that:
(1) validate the parameters used in the analysis required by paragraph M25.1;
(2) substantiate that the FRM is effective at limiting flammability exposure in all compartments of each tank for which the FRM is used to show compliance with paragraph M25.1; and
(3) describe the circumstances under which the FRM would not be operated during each phase of flight.
(4) identify critical features of the fuel tank system to prevent an auxiliary fuel tank installation from increasing the flammability exposure of main tanks above that permitted under paragraphs M25.1 (a) and (b) of this appendix and to prevent degradation of the performance and reliability of the FRM. (b) The applicant must validate that the FRM meets the requirements of paragraph M25.1 of this appendix with any aeroplane or engine configuration affecting the performance of the FRM for which approval is sought. (c) Any FRM failures or failures that could affect the FRM, with potential catastrophic consequences shall not result from a single failure or a combination of failures not shown to be extremely improbable. (d) It must be shown that the fuel tank pressures will remain within limits during normal operating conditions and failure conditions. (e) Oxygen-enriched air produced by the FRM must not create a hazard during normal operating conditions. M25.3 Reliability indications and maintenance access (a) Reliability indications must be provided to identify failures of the FRM that would otherwise be latent and whose identification is necessary to ensure the fuel tank with an FRM meets the fleet average flammability exposure listed in paragraph M25.1 of this appendix, including when the FRM is inoperative. (b) Sufficient accessibility to FRM reliability indications must be provided for maintenance personnel or the flight crew. (c) The accesses to the fuel tanks with FRMs (including any tanks that communicate with a tank via a vent system), and to any other confined spaces or enclosed areas that could contain hazardous atmosphere under normal conditions or failure conditions must be permanently stencilled, marked, or placarded to warn maintenance personnel of the possible presence of a potentially hazardous atmosphere. Those stencils, markings or placards must be installed such as to remain permanently visible during maintenance operations. M25.4 Airworthiness limitations and procedures The FRM shall be subject to analysis using conventional processes and methodology to ensure that the minimum scheduled maintenance tasks required for securing the continuing airworthiness of the system and installation are identified and published as part of the CS 25.1529 compliance. Maintenance tasks arising from either the Monte Carlo analysis or a CS 25.1309 safety assessment shall be dealt with in accordance with the principles laid down in AMC 25.1309.
(a) If FRM is used to comply with paragraph M25.1, Airworthiness Limitations must be identified for all maintenance or inspection tasks required to identify failures of components within the FRM that are needed to meet paragraph M25.1.
(b) Maintenance procedures must be developed to identify any hazards to be considered during maintenance of the fuel system and of the FRM. These procedures must be included in the instructions for continued airworthiness (ICA).
ED Decision 2009/010/R · Source